Fukushima Corium Experiment Creates Unexpected Result

As part of an ongoing series of corium experiments our research team has been doing, the newest experiment created a quite unusual result. The newest experiment, the fifth in a series conducted by Edano, took the top range of assumed melt mass and ran the experiment with a sustained high heat. Upon completion it was noticed that a modest amount of the lead had left the pedestal but what was in the pedestal was much more interesting! A perfectly formed elephant’s foot was found to have taken place in the pedestal. An elephant’s foot is the name given to an unusual corium melt structure found in Chernobyl.

 1934_8562ae5e286544710b2e7ebe9858833bElephant’s foot at Chernobyl

The elephant’s foot was also part of a rather bizarre story where liquidators wanted to shoot the formation with a gun to see if they could break it apart to see the interior.

The corium experiments at Brookhaven National Lab found some results that appeared to line up with ours. Brookhaven used varying levels of water as they dropped lead into the drywell. Our experiments with varying lead volumes but without water follow a similar pattern to Brookhaven’s illustrations. Experiments 3 and 4 (ours) had similar melt spreads to the first stages of the Brookhaven melt spreads. It appears that fuel melt volume plays a role in the formation of an elephants foot.


Brookhaven experiments corium formations.

document(2)____pdf SAM_0721 Brookhaven experiment (top), our experiment (below)

If you are not familiar with the previous experiments you can read about those here: The series of experiments have looked at both glass and lead as a stand in material for the melted fuel mass (corium). One key difference between lead and actual corium is the ability of corium to generate heat on an ongoing basis allowing it to continue to be fluid for much longer than lead might. Lead was still considered a sufficient corium stand it that it was used in the early corium experiments at Brookhaven National Lab in the US. Lead volumes of the lead experiments: corium weights (net) : exp#3 = 103g (41.2%) exp#4 = 138g (55.2%) exp#5 = 273g (109.2%) * given that 250g is 100% experiment #2 was not weighed, experiment #1 did not process.  Experiment Details: Corium model material: Lead Corium model weight: 300g of lead was used as the starting material Corium finished weight :was 273g that calculates to 110% of estimated core volume. 250g would be 100% core volume. This is the high range of our experiments. Temperature: 400c held for one hour * some minor shaking was included to simulate the intense and repeated aftershocks reported during the melt down phase of the reactors at Fukushima Daiichi. At this point this factor doesn’t appear to have been a deciding factor in the unusual outcome and might have actually deterred such an outcome. The lead mass was packed into the modified tea strainer mesh as with previous experiments. The tea mesh is suspended inside the kiln with a fitted sheet of garden mesh (fence). It is worth noting that the suspension of the tea strainer removes any contact with the pedestal. This removes the potential for heat transfer from the tea strainer to the ceramic pedestal, something you would likely see in a real world meltdown.  An aluminum foil tube was added to the top of the tea strainer to help contain the lead and to create a condition closer to a reactor vessel. The aluminum foil walls direct the lead towards the bottom of the tea strainer as would be found in a BWR reactor where the bottom head is full of holes from the control rod systems. bwr_bottom_head After the melt process in the metals kiln, about 25g of lead remained in the tea strainer set up. Previous experiments saw some amount of residue remain in the tea strainer. It is assumed the remaining lead in this experiment may have remained in the strainer due to the lack of any mass behind it to continue to push it through. The images that follow include explanation and other information about the experiment as commentary along with the images. Large format versions of these images can be found here. The video of the details of the lead melt and elephant’s foot can be found here. The video gives a much better idea of the details of the melt than the images can do. SAM_0693 The tea mesh with the foil tube prepared to go into the melting kiln. SAM_0696 Close up of the 300g of lead prepared for melting.


 Weight of the lead with the mesh strainer and foil container. SAM_0699 Pedestal made of common terra cotta ceramic. This is the same pedestal arrangement with doorway as used in previous experiments. In this one the top was cut down to accommodate the larger load of lead. The steel food tin lid is again used as the stand in for the drywell floor. In previous experiments it was noted that the lead was adhering and fusing with the terra cotta ceramic floor so the steel one was used on later experiments. SAM_0700 The experiment prepared in the kiln. The tea mesh assembly is suspended over the ceramic pedestal with a piece of garden fencing to act as a support and to keep it out of contact of the pedestal (prevent possible heat transfer).


Handwritten note of the experiment number, date, lead weight and temperature.


 Time clock & date plus ambient temperature. SAM_0704 After the one hour run at 400c this was the result seen as the door was opened. SAM_0705 View of the melt result from above with the mesh strainer assembly removed. SAM_0707 View inside the pedestal shows the raised mass of the elephant’s foot.


 Another view of the pedestal shows a considerable amount of the melt did exit the pedestal door into the drywell.


 Another view of the elephant’s foot inside the pedestal and the lead that escaped the pedestal doorway. SAM_0711 Overhead view shows how the layers of lead melt creeped around the pedestal in a circular fashion before cooling and stopping. SAM_0712 In this view the different layers and the homogeneous nature of certain parts vs. other parts of the melt. The portions of the elephants foot have a much more aerated and less uniform appearance. SAM_0713 The remaining 25g of lead melt in the mesh strainer with the foil tube removed. SAM_0714 Side view of the tube and strainer after the melt run. SAM_0715 Inside of the foil tube shows no lead adhered to the inside.


Finished weight of the mass that left the reactor vessel model. 273 grams. SAM_0721 Side view of the elephant’s foot with the portion that leaked out the pedestal to the right. Distinct layers can be seen in the melt. SAM_0722 Angled view, wrinkles and fissures can be seen in the intermediate layer. SAM_0723 Top view of the lead melt. Areas of the melt flow can be seen as they curved around the inside of the pedestal.     SAM_0724 Underside of the melt, the elephant’s foot even has a clear division among the melt on the underside. SAM_0727 The underside of the strainer mesh shows the remaining lead. SAM_0728 Another overhead view of the melt. The amount that escaped the pedestal can be clearly seen along with the upper layers that stopped short of leaving the pedestal. SAM_0729 Overhead view columns dripping off of the elephants foot can be seen in the upper right. SAM_0730 More detail of the elephant’s foot. SAM_0733 Side view shows the difference between the bottom layer and the top layers in consistency. SAM_0734 Detail of the elephant’s foot top.   SAM_0736 We are still reviewing the results of this experiment. Additional conclusions and additional experimental lead melts may be done as we continue to gather information.

This article would not be possible without the extensive efforts of the SimplyInfo research team
Join the conversation at chat.simplyinfo.org

© 2011-2016 SimplyInfo.org, Fukuleaks.org All Rights Reserved Content cited, quoted etc. from other sources is under the respective rights of that content owner. If you are viewing this page on any website other than www.simplyinfo.org (or www.fukuleaks.org) it may be plagiarized, please let us know. If you wish to reproduce any of our content in full or in more than a phrase or quote, please contact us first to obtain permission.

Nancy Foust

Editor, SimplyInfo.org

Leave a Reply